Quick recall · 222 cards
Short MCQ-style retrieval prompts. Tap a card to reveal the answer.
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: The population of City A is growing at a rate of 10% annually. Conclusions: I. City A will face housing shortages in the future. II. City A has a larger population than City B.
D · D. Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: The school is closed in May. Conclusions: I. Students are admitted to the school before June. II. The school remains open in June.
D · D. Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: Gold prices are rising each day in the market. Conclusions: I. Nobody wears gold nowadays. II. It has become tougher to locate gold deposits.
D · D. Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: Agrima took part in a State-level singing competition and won it. Conclusions: I. Agrima is the best singer in the country. II. Agrima can dance well.
D · D. Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: Computer literates have good reasoning ability. Seema can understand the puzzle quickly. Conclusions: I. Seema is computer literate. II. Seema has good reasoning ability.
B · B. Only conclusion II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: Most students in the class passed the exam.
Conclusions:
I. All students passed the exam.
II. Some students passed the exam.
B · B. Only conclusion II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: The population of City A is growing at a rate of 10% annually.
Conclusions:
I. City A will face housing shortages in the future.
II. City A has a large population compared to other cities.
D · D. Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: The school announced the commencement of a new academic session starting in June.
Conclusions:
I. The school is closed in May.
II. Students are admitted to the school before June.
B · B. Only conclusion II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: Gold prices are rising each day in the market.
Conclusions:
I. Nobody wears gold nowadays.
II. It has become tougher to locate gold deposits.
D · D. Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: Computer literates have good reasoning ability. Seema can understand the puzzle quickly.
Conclusions:
I. Seema is computer literate.
II. Seema has good reasoning ability.
B · B. Only conclusion II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: The old order changed yielding place to new.
Conclusions:
I. Change is the law of nature.
II. Discard old ideas because they are old.
A · A. Only conclusion I follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statement: Agrima took part in a State-level singing competition and won it.
Conclusions:
I. Agrima is the best singer in the country.
II. Agrima can dance well.
D · D. Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statements:
All dogs are mammals.
Some mammals are pets.
Conclusions:
I. Some dogs are pets.
II. Some pets are dogs.
D · D. Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statements:
No women teacher can play.
Some women teachers are athletes.
Conclusions:
I. Male athletes can play.
II. Some athletes can play.
D · D. Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Mike finished ahead of Paul.
Paul and Brian both finished before Liam.
Owen did not finish last.
Who was the last to finish?
D · D. Liam
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statements:
All mangoes are golden in colour.
No golden-coloured things are cheap.
Conclusions:
I. All mangoes are expensive.
II. Some golden-coloured mangoes are not cheap.
B · B. Only II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statements: All cats are dogs. All dogs are animals. Conclusions: I. All cats are animals. II. Some animals are dogs. Which conclusion(s) logically follow from the statements?
A · Only I follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statements: Some pens are books. No book is a pencil. Conclusions: I. Some pens are not pencils. II. All books are pens. Which conclusion(s) logically follow from the statements?
A · Only I follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statements: All chairs are tables. Some tables are wooden. Conclusions: I. All chairs are wooden. II. Some wooden objects are chairs. Which conclusion(s) logically follow from the statements?
D · Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statements: Some ants are parrots. All parrots are apples. Conclusions: I. All apples are parrots. II. Some ants are apples. Which conclusion(s) logically follow from the statements?
B · Only II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statements: Some papers are pens. All pencils are pens. Conclusions: I. Some papers are pencils. II. All pens are papers. Which conclusion(s) logically follow from the statements?
D · Neither I nor II follows
PYQ
Tap to reveal →
Statements: Some horses are not trucks. All vehicles are trucks. Conclusions: I. Some horses are not vehicles. II. Some vehicles are horses. Which conclusion(s) logically follow from the statements?
A · Only I follows
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes a statement in logical reasoning?
A · An expression that can be either true or false
A statement in logical reasoning is a declarative sentence that is either true or false, but not both.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the condition: "If it rains, then the ground will be wet." Which of the following is the contrapositive of this statement?
B · If the ground is not wet, then it does not rain
The contrapositive of "If P then Q" is "If not Q then not P", which in this case is "If the ground is not wet, then it does not rain."
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the statement: "All birds can fly." Which of the following is a valid condition to test this statement?
A · If an animal is a bird, then it can fly
The original statement implies that being a bird is sufficient to fly, so the condition "If an animal is a bird, then it can fly" directly tests the statement.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the statement: "If a number is divisible by 4, then it is divisible by 2." Which of the following is NOT a valid conclusion?
C · If a number is divisible by 2, it is divisible by 4
The original statement does not imply that divisibility by 2 guarantees divisibility by 4, so conclusion C is invalid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All students who study regularly pass the exam." Which conclusion logically follows?
B · No student who studies regularly fails the exam
If all students who study regularly pass, then none of them fail. Hence, conclusion B is valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the machine is switched on, it will start working." Which of the following conclusions is valid?
A · If the machine is not working, it is not switched on
The contrapositive of the statement is "If the machine is not working, then it is not switched on," which is a valid conclusion.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given: "All roses are flowers." Which of the following conclusions is logically valid?
B · Some flowers are roses
From "All roses are flowers," it follows that some flowers (at least the roses) exist, so some flowers are roses.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If a person is a doctor, then they have a medical degree." Which conclusion is NOT valid?
B · If a person has a medical degree, they are a doctor
Having a medical degree does not necessarily mean the person is a doctor; they could be a student or in another profession.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If the statement "All cats are mammals" is true, which of the following is a valid inference?
B · Some mammals are cats
If all cats are mammals, then at least some mammals are cats (those cats).
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the statement: "If it is a holiday, then the office is closed." Which of the following is a correct inference?
A · If the office is not closed, then it is not a holiday
The contrapositive "If the office is not closed, then it is not a holiday" is a valid inference.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If a person is eligible to vote, then they are above 18 years of age." Which of the following is a valid inference?
A · If a person is below 18, they are not eligible to vote
The contrapositive is valid: if a person is below 18, then they are not eligible to vote.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the statement: "If the alarm rings, then there is a fire." Which of the following weakens this statement?
B · Sometimes the alarm rings due to a system malfunction
If the alarm rings sometimes due to malfunction, the statement that alarm ringing implies fire is weakened.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If a student passes the exam, then they have studied." Which of the following is a valid conditional reasoning?
B · If a student has not studied, then they do not pass the exam
The contrapositive "If not studied, then not pass" is valid conditional reasoning.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given: "If the traffic light is green, then vehicles can move." Which of the following is a valid medium-level conditional reasoning statement?
A · If vehicles cannot move, then the traffic light is not green
The contrapositive "If vehicles cannot move, then the traffic light is not green" is valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If a product is defective, then it will be returned." Which of the following is a hard-level conditional reasoning inference?
A · If a product is not returned, then it is not defective
The contrapositive "If not returned, then not defective" is a valid inference, while the others may not necessarily hold.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Evaluate the assumption in the statement: "The company increased its advertising budget, so sales will increase." Which assumption is implicit?
A · Increased advertising always leads to increased sales
The statement assumes that increasing advertising will cause sales to increase.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the government reduces taxes, then the economy will improve." Which assumption weakens this statement?
B · Other factors may affect the economy more than taxes
Assuming other factors may have more impact weakens the direct cause-effect relationship.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a hard-level question on evaluating assumptions in the statement: "The new policy will reduce unemployment."?
B · Unemployment depends on multiple factors
Assuming unemployment depends on multiple factors challenges the direct effect of the policy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the factory increases production, then profits will rise." Which assumption strengthens this statement?
A · Demand for the product is high
High demand ensures that increased production leads to higher profits, strengthening the statement.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "Heavy rainfall causes flooding in the area." Which of the following best describes the cause-effect relationship here?
C · Heavy rainfall is the cause, flooding is the effect
Heavy rainfall is the cause that leads to the effect, flooding.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If a factory emits toxic gases, then nearby plants wither. Which of the following is a medium-level cause-effect analysis?
B · Toxic gas emission causes plants to wither
The emission of toxic gases is the cause; plant withering is the effect.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "Increased screen time leads to eye strain." Which of the following weakens this cause-effect relationship?
B · Some people do not experience eye strain despite long screen time
If some people do not experience eye strain despite long screen time, the direct cause-effect relationship is weakened.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If a statement is true, then its negation is false." Which of the following shows logical consistency?
B · A statement and its negation cannot both be true
Logical consistency requires that a statement and its negation cannot both be true simultaneously.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following pairs of statements is contradictory?
A · "All birds can fly" and "Some birds cannot fly"
The statements "All birds can fly" and "Some birds cannot fly" cannot both be true, so they are contradictory.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement 1: "If it rains, the ground is wet." Statement 2: "The ground is not wet." Which of the following is logically consistent?
B · It is not raining
If the ground is not wet, then it cannot be raining, which is logically consistent with statement 1.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following weakens the argument: "The new drug is effective because most patients recovered after taking it."?
A · Patients recovered due to other treatments
If patients recovered due to other treatments, the argument that the drug caused recovery is weakened.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "Increasing exercise improves health." Which of the following strengthens this argument?
A · Studies show regular exercise reduces disease risk
Scientific studies supporting exercise benefits strengthen the argument.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following weakens the argument: "The company’s profits increased because of the new marketing strategy."?
A · The market demand increased independently
If profits increased due to market demand, the role of marketing strategy is weakened.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the policy is implemented, unemployment will decrease." Which of the following strengthens this argument at a hard level?
A · The policy targets sectors with high unemployment
Targeting sectors with high unemployment directly supports the argument that the policy will reduce unemployment.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes a statement in logical reasoning?
A · A sentence that expresses a fact or opinion and can be true or false
A statement is a declarative sentence that can be assigned a truth value, either true or false, which is fundamental in logical reasoning.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the statement: "If it rains, then the ground is wet." Which part of this statement is the condition?
C · "If it rains"
In an if-then statement, the 'if' part represents the condition or antecedent, which is "If it rains" in this case.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the statement: "All birds can fly." Which of the following is a valid conclusion?
D · Birds are animals that can fly.
The statement implies that birds are animals capable of flying; however, it does not specify that all flying creatures are birds or that penguins can fly. Option D correctly restates the statement.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the alarm rings, then there is a fire." Which of the following conclusions is invalid?
D · If there is a fire, the alarm rings.
The original statement does not imply that every fire causes the alarm to ring (no converse). Hence, conclusion D is invalid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If the statement "All cats are mammals" is true, which of the following is a logical implication?
A · Some mammals are cats.
If all cats are mammals, then some mammals (at least those cats) are cats. The other options contradict the original statement.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given: "If a student studies hard, then he will pass the exam." Which inference is logically correct?
C · If a student does not pass the exam, he did not study hard.
The contrapositive of the statement is: If a student does not pass the exam, then he did not study hard, which is logically equivalent to the original statement.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the statement: "If the traffic light is green, then vehicles can move." Which of the following is the converse of this statement?
A · If vehicles can move, then the traffic light is green.
The converse of an if-then statement switches the hypothesis and conclusion: If vehicles can move, then the traffic light is green.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Evaluate the assumption in the statement: "The factory stopped production because of a power outage." Which assumption is implicit?
B · Power outage affects factory operations.
The statement assumes that a power outage impacts the factory's ability to produce, which is why production stopped.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the machine is faulty, then the output is defective." Which of the following is the negation of this statement?
A · The machine is faulty and the output is not defective.
The negation of an if-then statement \( p \rightarrow q \) is \( p \wedge eg q \), meaning the machine is faulty but the output is not defective.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If "If it snows, then the roads are slippery" is true, which of the following is logically consistent with it?
C · If the roads are not slippery, then it does not snow.
The contrapositive of the statement is: If the roads are not slippery, then it does not snow, which is logically equivalent and consistent.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following pairs of statements are contradictory?
B · "If it rains, the ground is wet." and "If it rains, the ground is dry."
The statements "If it rains, the ground is wet" and "If it rains, the ground is dry" cannot both be true simultaneously, making them contradictory.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Cause and effect relationship: "Because the power went out, the computers shut down." Which of the following is the effect?
B · Computers shut down
The effect is the event that happens as a result of the cause; here, the computers shutting down is the effect of the power outage.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the temperature rises above 30°C, then the ice cream melts." Which is the correct converse statement?
A · If the ice cream melts, then the temperature rises above 30°C.
The converse of an if-then statement switches the hypothesis and conclusion: If the ice cream melts, then the temperature rises above 30°C.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid assumption in the statement: "The school canceled classes due to heavy rain."?
A · Heavy rain affects school operations.
The statement assumes that heavy rain impacts the school's ability to conduct classes, leading to their cancellation.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If "If a person exercises regularly, then he is healthy" is true, which of the following is an invalid conclusion?
B · A healthy person exercises regularly.
The original statement does not imply that all healthy people exercise regularly; hence conclusion B is invalid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements is the negation of "All flowers are red"?
B · Some flowers are not red.
The negation of a universal affirmative statement "All flowers are red" is "Some flowers are not red."
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the statement: "If the engine fails, then the car stops." Which of the following is the contrapositive statement?
B · If the car does not stop, then the engine does not fail.
The contrapositive of \( p \rightarrow q \) is \( eg q \rightarrow eg p \), here: If the car does not stop, then the engine does not fail.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best illustrates a cause and effect relationship?
B · Because the heater was on, the room became warm.
Option B clearly shows a cause (heater was on) leading to an effect (room became warm).
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If a person is a teacher, then he has a degree." Which of the following is a valid inference?
C · If a person does not have a degree, then he is not a teacher.
The contrapositive of the statement is: If a person does not have a degree, then he is not a teacher, which is a valid inference.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following pairs of statements are logically consistent?
A · "All cats are animals." and "Some animals are cats."
The statements "All cats are animals" and "Some animals are cats" can both be true simultaneously, so they are logically consistent.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If "If the light is on, then the room is bright" is true, which of the following is the correct inverse statement?
A · If the light is off, then the room is not bright.
The inverse of \( p \rightarrow q \) is \( eg p \rightarrow eg q \), which here is: If the light is off, then the room is not bright.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the software is updated, then the system runs faster." Which of the following is a valid conclusion?
C · If the system does not run faster, the software is not updated.
The contrapositive is: If the system does not run faster, then the software is not updated, which is logically equivalent and valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements best shows logical inconsistency?
B · "All dogs bark." and "Some dogs do not bark."
The statements "All dogs bark" and "Some dogs do not bark" contradict each other, showing logical inconsistency.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Cause and effect: "Due to the heavy snowfall, the airport was closed." Which of the following is the cause?
B · Heavy snowfall
The cause is the event that leads to another event; here, heavy snowfall caused the airport closure.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is the converse of the statement: "If a person is a doctor, then he has a medical degree."?
A · If a person has a medical degree, then he is a doctor.
The converse switches the hypothesis and conclusion: If a person has a medical degree, then he is a doctor.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a certain logical system, the statement "If P then Q" is true. Additionally, it is known that "If Q then R" is false, and "If R then P" is true. Given these conditions, which of the following must be true?
A · P is false
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the statements: (i) If the system is secure, then the data is encrypted. (ii) If the data is encrypted, then the key is complex. (iii) The key is not complex. Which of the following conclusions is logically valid?
C · Both the system is not secure and the data is not encrypted
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a logic puzzle, the following statements are given:
1. If the door is locked, then the alarm is on.
2. The alarm is not on if and only if the window is open.
3. The window is closed.
Which of the following is true?
C · The alarm is on and the door is locked
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A statement S is defined as: "If and only if P is true, then Q is false." Given that P and Q are boolean variables, which of the following is logically equivalent to S?
A · P ↔ ¬Q
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the statements:
1. If the machine is faulty, then the alarm sounds.
2. The alarm does not sound if and only if the machine is not faulty.
3. The alarm sounds.
Which of the following is true?
A · The machine is faulty
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a logical framework, the following is true:
- Statement A implies Statement B.
- Statement B implies Statement C.
- Statement C is false.
Which of the following can be concluded?
C · Both Statement A and B are false
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the statement: "If the code passes all tests, then it is bug-free. However, the code is not bug-free. Additionally, if the code is bug-free, then the documentation is complete." Which of the following is true?
A · The code does not pass all tests and documentation is incomplete
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the statements:
(i) If the project is delayed, then the budget will be exceeded.
(ii) The budget is not exceeded.
(iii) If the budget is exceeded, then the client will be unhappy.
Which of the following is true?
A · The project is not delayed and the client is happy
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Assertion (A): "If a statement is true, then its negation is false."
Reason (R): "A statement and its negation cannot both be true simultaneously."
Choose the correct option:
A · Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If the statement "If P then Q" is false, which of the following must be true?
A · P is true and Q is false
Step 1: "If P then Q" is false only when P is true and Q is false.
Step 2: Otherwise, the implication is true.
Step 3: Hence, option A is correct.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the statements:
(i) If the system is compromised, then the firewall is disabled.
(ii) The firewall is enabled.
(iii) If the firewall is enabled, then the system is secure.
Which of the following is correct?
B · The system is secure
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best defines a statement in logical reasoning?
A · A sentence that expresses a fact or opinion and can be either true or false
A statement is a declarative sentence that is either true or false, which is fundamental in logical reasoning.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Identify which of the following is NOT a statement:
B · "Is it raining outside?"
A question is not a statement because it does not declare something that can be true or false.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the statement: "All birds can fly," which of the following conclusions logically follows?
D · Birds are animals.
The statement implies birds are a category of animals, so 'Birds are animals' is a valid conclusion.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a type of conclusion in logical reasoning?
D · All of the above
Conclusions can be definite, indefinite, or possible depending on the strength of the logical connection to the statement.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All roses are flowers. Some flowers fade quickly." Which conclusion is valid?
B · Some roses may fade quickly.
Since some flowers fade quickly and roses are flowers, it is possible some roses fade quickly, but not certain.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following conclusions is an example of a possible conclusion?
B · Some cats are black.
The conclusion 'Some cats are black' is possible based on general knowledge but not definite from a given statement.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "No reptiles are warm-blooded. All snakes are reptiles." Which conclusion is valid?
B · No snake is warm-blooded.
Since no reptiles are warm-blooded and all snakes are reptiles, no snake can be warm-blooded.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "Some students are athletes. All athletes are disciplined." Which conclusion is definitely valid?
A · Some students are disciplined.
Since some students are athletes and all athletes are disciplined, some students are disciplined.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which factor is most important in evaluating the validity of a conclusion drawn from a statement?
B · The logical connection between the statement and conclusion
Validity depends on the logical connection between the statement and the conclusion, not on superficial factors.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All cars are vehicles. Some vehicles are electric." Which conclusion is valid?
B · Some cars may be electric.
Since some vehicles are electric and all cars are vehicles, some cars may be electric but it is not definite.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "No birds are mammals. All sparrows are birds." Which conclusion is valid?
B · No sparrow is a mammal.
Since no birds are mammals and sparrows are birds, no sparrow can be a mammal.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All engineers are logical. Some logical people are creative." Which conclusion is valid?
B · Some engineers may be creative.
Since some logical people are creative and all engineers are logical, some engineers may be creative but not necessarily all.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid logical deduction technique?
B · Using syllogisms to infer conclusions from premises
Syllogistic reasoning is a valid logical deduction technique to infer conclusions from given premises.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All mammals are warm-blooded. All whales are mammals." Which conclusion follows by logical deduction?
A · All whales are warm-blooded.
Since all mammals are warm-blooded and whales are mammals, all whales are warm-blooded.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of a logical deduction technique?
B · Syllogistic reasoning
Syllogistic reasoning is a formal method of logical deduction using premises to reach conclusions.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "Some fruits are sweet. All apples are fruits." Which conclusion can be logically deduced?
B · Some apples may be sweet.
Since some fruits are sweet and apples are fruits, some apples may be sweet but not necessarily all.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a common logical fallacy when drawing conclusions?
A · Affirming the consequent
Affirming the consequent is a logical fallacy where one assumes the cause from the effect incorrectly.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If it rains, the ground is wet. The ground is wet." Which fallacy is committed if one concludes "It rained"?
A · Affirming the consequent
Affirming the consequent fallacy occurs when one assumes the cause because the effect is observed, which may not be true.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of a logical fallacy in conclusions?
A · Assuming correlation implies causation
Assuming correlation implies causation is a common logical fallacy leading to invalid conclusions.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All dogs bark. Some animals bark." Which conclusion is an example of a logical fallacy if stated as "All animals that bark are dogs"?
B · Affirming the consequent
Assuming 'All animals that bark are dogs' affirms the consequent and is a logical fallacy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In syllogistic reasoning, which of the following is a valid syllogism?
A · All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
The first syllogism is valid as the conclusion logically follows from the premises.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "No reptiles are warm-blooded. All snakes are reptiles." Which conclusion is valid using syllogistic reasoning?
B · No snake is warm-blooded.
Using syllogistic reasoning, since no reptiles are warm-blooded and snakes are reptiles, no snake is warm-blooded.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following syllogisms is invalid?
A · All flowers are plants. Some plants are trees. Therefore, some flowers are trees.
The conclusion that some flowers are trees does not logically follow from the premises.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the power supply fails, the machine stops. The machine has stopped." Which conclusion is valid regarding cause and effect?
B · The machine stopped due to power supply failure or other reasons.
The machine stopping could be caused by power failure or other reasons; the cause is not definite.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best illustrates a cause and effect relationship?
A · It rained heavily, so the streets are flooded.
Heavy rain causing flooded streets is a direct cause and effect relationship.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "The factory stopped production because of a power outage." Which of the following is a valid inference?
A · Power outage caused the factory to stop production.
The statement explicitly states the power outage caused the stoppage, so this is a valid inference.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All successful entrepreneurs take risks." Which assumption is implicit in this statement?
A · Taking risks is necessary for success in entrepreneurship.
The statement assumes that risk-taking is necessary for entrepreneurial success.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "The new policy will reduce pollution." Which inference can be drawn?
A · The policy is designed to address pollution.
The statement implies the policy aims to reduce pollution, so it is designed to address it.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the alarm rings, there is a fire." The alarm is ringing. Which assumption is valid?
A · There is definitely a fire.
The statement assumes that the alarm ringing indicates a fire, so the assumption is that there is a fire.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All students passed the exam." Which inference is incorrect?
C · All students scored the same marks.
The statement does not imply all students scored the same marks, so this inference is incorrect.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best describes a statement in logical reasoning?
A · A sentence that expresses a fact or opinion and can be true or false
A statement is a declarative sentence that is either true or false, which is fundamental to logical reasoning.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Identify which of the following is NOT a statement:
B · "Is it raining today?"
A question does not assert a fact and cannot be true or false, so it is not a statement.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements is a factual statement?
B · "The Earth revolves around the Sun."
The statement about Earth revolving around the Sun is a scientifically proven fact.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the statement: "If it rains, the ground will be wet." Which of the following conclusions is definitely true?
C · If it rains, then the ground is wet.
The statement is a conditional: if it rains, then the ground will be wet. This conclusion restates the original statement and is definitely true.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All roses are flowers. Some flowers fade quickly." Which conclusion is definitely true?
B · Some roses may fade quickly.
Since some flowers fade quickly and all roses are flowers, it is possible that some roses fade quickly, but it is not definite.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "The library is closed on Sundays." Which of the following conclusions is NOT possible?
C · The library is open on Sundays.
The statement explicitly says the library is closed on Sundays, so it cannot be open on Sundays.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "Some students are athletes." Which conclusion is definitely true?
B · Some athletes are students.
If some students are athletes, then it is definitely true that some athletes are students.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the alarm rings, then there is a fire." Which conclusion is definitely true?
B · If the alarm rings, there is a fire.
The statement is a conditional 'if p then q'; the conclusion restates this and is definitely true.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "No cats are dogs. Some pets are cats." Which conclusion is possible?
A · Some pets are not dogs.
Since some pets are cats and cats are not dogs, it is possible that some pets are not dogs.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All engineers are problem solvers. Some problem solvers are artists." Which conclusion is NOT possible?
B · All problem solvers are engineers.
The statement does not say all problem solvers are engineers, so this conclusion is not possible.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If it is a weekend, the park is crowded." Which conclusion is logically valid?
C · If it is a weekend, the park is crowded.
The statement is a conditional 'if p then q'; only conclusion C restates it correctly and is valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "Some fruits are sweet. All apples are fruits." Which conclusion is valid?
B · Some apples may be sweet.
Since some fruits are sweet and all apples are fruits, it is possible that some apples are sweet.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the machine is on, it produces noise." Which conclusion is invalid?
A · If there is noise, the machine is on.
The original statement does not imply that noise only occurs if the machine is on, so conclusion A is invalid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All birds have wings. Penguins are birds." Which conclusion is logically valid?
A · Penguins have wings.
Since all birds have wings and penguins are birds, penguins have wings is valid, though they cannot fly.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If a student studies hard, then he will pass the exam." Which conclusion is definitely true?
C · If the student studies hard, he will pass.
The statement is a conditional 'if p then q'; only conclusion C restates this correctly and is definitely true.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "Some cars are electric. All electric vehicles are eco-friendly." Which conclusion is valid?
A · Some cars are eco-friendly.
Since some cars are electric and all electric vehicles are eco-friendly, some cars are eco-friendly is valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All mammals are warm-blooded. Whales are mammals." Which conclusion is logically valid?
A · Whales are warm-blooded.
Since all mammals are warm-blooded and whales are mammals, whales are warm-blooded is logically valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All teachers are educated. Some educated people are musicians." Which conclusion can be inferred?
C · Some educated people are teachers.
Since all teachers are educated, some educated people being musicians does not imply teachers are musicians, but some educated people are teachers.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "No reptiles have feathers. Some animals with feathers can fly." Which conclusion is valid?
B · No reptiles have feathers.
The statement explicitly says no reptiles have feathers, so conclusion B is valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If it is a holiday, the office is closed. Today is not a holiday." Which conclusion is possible?
B · The office is open today.
Since today is not a holiday, the office may be open; the statement does not guarantee closure on non-holidays.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All fruits have seeds. Tomatoes have seeds." Which conclusion is valid?
A · Tomatoes are fruits.
Since all fruits have seeds and tomatoes have seeds, it is valid to conclude tomatoes are fruits based on the statement.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the power goes out, the alarm will stop working." The alarm is not working. Which conclusion is valid?
C · The power may have gone out.
If the alarm is not working, the power may have gone out, but it could also be due to other reasons; hence, conclusion C is valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All politicians are honest. Some honest people are lawyers." Which conclusion contains a logical fallacy?
B · All honest people are politicians.
The statement does not imply all honest people are politicians; this is a logical fallacy (affirming the consequent).
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If it rains, the streets get wet. The streets are wet." Which conclusion is a logical fallacy?
A · It has rained.
Assuming it has rained because the streets are wet is affirming the consequent, a logical fallacy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All dogs bark. Max is a dog. Max barks." Which conclusion is a logical fallacy?
A · Max is a dog because he barks.
Concluding Max is a dog just because he barks is affirming the consequent, a logical fallacy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If a student passes the exam, then he has studied. John has studied." Which conclusion is a logical fallacy?
A · John will pass the exam.
The statement does not guarantee that studying always leads to passing; concluding John will pass is affirming the antecedent but may not be valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All cats are animals. Some animals are pets. Some cats are pets." Which conclusion is logically valid using syllogistic reasoning?
B · Some cats are pets.
Since some animals are pets and all cats are animals, it is valid that some cats are pets.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All engineers are logical. Some logical people are creative." Which conclusion follows from syllogistic reasoning?
A · Some engineers are creative.
Since some logical people are creative and all engineers are logical, some engineers may be creative.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If a person exercises regularly, then he is healthy. Some healthy people are athletes." Which conclusion is valid using syllogistic reasoning?
B · Some athletes are healthy.
Since some healthy people are athletes, it is valid that some athletes are healthy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If it rains, the ground gets wet. It is raining." Which conclusion is valid using conditional reasoning?
A · The ground is wet.
Given the condition and the fact it is raining, the ground getting wet is a valid conclusion.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "If the traffic light is red, vehicles stop. Vehicles are stopped." Which conclusion is a logical fallacy in causal reasoning?
A · The traffic light is red.
Assuming the traffic light is red just because vehicles stopped is affirming the consequent, a logical fallacy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All students who study hard pass the exam. John passed the exam." Which conclusion is an assumption rather than a fact?
A · John studied hard.
Passing the exam does not necessarily mean John studied hard; assuming so is an assumption, not a fact.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "The factory emits smoke. The air quality is poor." Which conclusion is an assumption?
A · The factory causes poor air quality.
Assuming the factory causes poor air quality is an assumption; correlation does not imply causation.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Statement: "All birds have feathers. Penguins have feathers." Which conclusion is an assumption?
A · Penguins are birds.
Assuming penguins are birds just because they have feathers is an assumption; other animals may have feathers too.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best defines a syllogism in logical reasoning?
A · A form of argument with two premises and a conclusion
A syllogism is a logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two premises.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In syllogistic logic, what is the term for the statement that follows from the premises?
B · Conclusion
The conclusion is the statement that logically follows from the given premises in a syllogism.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Identify the middle term in the following syllogism: "All cats are animals. All animals are living beings. Therefore, all cats are living beings."
B · Animals
The middle term appears in both premises but not in the conclusion. Here, 'animals' is the middle term.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which type of syllogism is represented by the statement: "If it rains, then the ground is wet. It is raining. Therefore, the ground is wet."?
B · Conditional syllogism
This is a conditional syllogism where the first premise is a conditional statement, and the conclusion follows from the affirmation of the antecedent.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of a disjunctive syllogism?
A · Either the light is on or the fan is running. The light is not on. Therefore, the fan is running.
Disjunctive syllogism involves a disjunction (either/or statement) and the negation of one disjunct leading to the affirmation of the other.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is NOT a valid type of categorical proposition?
D · U: Universal Conditional
The standard forms of categorical propositions are A, E, I, and O. 'U' is not a recognized form.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Identify the form of the proposition: "Some students are not athletes."
D · O (Particular Negative)
The proposition states a particular negative, which corresponds to the O form.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following correctly represents the proposition "No dogs are cats" in standard form?
B · No dogs are cats.
The proposition is a universal negative, represented by E form: No S are P.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid rule for a categorical syllogism?
A · The middle term must be distributed at least once.
One key rule is that the middle term must be distributed at least once in the premises for the syllogism to be valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a valid syllogism, which of the following is true regarding the distribution of terms?
A · If a term is distributed in the conclusion, it must be distributed in the premises.
A valid syllogism requires that any term distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in the premises.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following syllogisms violates the rule that the middle term must be distributed at least once?
D · Some cats are animals. Some animals are dogs. Therefore, some cats are dogs.
In option D, the middle term (animals) is not distributed in either premise, violating the rule.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following syllogisms is invalid due to drawing a conclusion from two negative premises?
A · No cats are dogs. No dogs are birds. Therefore, no cats are birds.
A syllogism with two negative premises is invalid because no conclusion can be drawn.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the diagram below. Which region represents "All A are B" in the Venn diagram with circles A and B?
A · The entire circle A inside circle B
In "All A are B", circle A is entirely within circle B, meaning all elements of A are also in B.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the Venn diagram below showing three sets A, B, and C. Which conclusion is valid if the shaded area represents "No A are B"?
B · No A are B
The shaded area indicates no overlap between A and B, so "No A are B" is valid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the Venn diagram below with three circles A, B, and C. If the shaded area represents "Some A are B", which of the following is true?
C · At least one element is common to A and B
The shaded overlapping region indicates that some elements belong to both A and B.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the Venn diagram below. Which of the following conclusions is valid if the shaded area represents "All B are C"?
B · All B are C
The shading shows that circle B is entirely within circle C, representing "All B are C".
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following arguments is valid based on the rules of syllogism?
A · All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
The first argument is a classic valid syllogism with a universal affirmative major premise and a particular minor premise.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the premises: "All A are B" and "Some C are A", which of the following conclusions is valid?
A · Some C are B
Since all A are B and some C are A, it follows that some C are B.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following syllogisms is invalid?
A · All flowers are plants. Some plants are trees. Therefore, some flowers are trees.
The conclusion in option A does not logically follow from the premises; it commits the fallacy of the undistributed middle.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the diagram below. Based on the shaded regions, which conclusion is valid from the premises "All A are B" and "No B are C"?
A · No A are C
If all A are B and no B are C, then no A can be C, as A is a subset of B.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
From the statements: "Some students are athletes." and "All athletes are disciplined.", which conclusion follows?
A · Some students are disciplined.
Since some students are athletes and all athletes are disciplined, some students are disciplined.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a common logical fallacy in syllogisms?
A · Affirming the consequent
Affirming the consequent is a logical fallacy where one assumes the converse of a conditional statement is true.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which fallacy is committed in the argument: "If it rains, the ground is wet. The ground is wet. Therefore, it rained."?
A · Affirming the consequent
This argument assumes that because the consequent is true, the antecedent must be true, which is a fallacy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of the fallacy of the undistributed middle?
A · All cats are animals. All dogs are animals. Therefore, all cats are dogs.
The middle term 'animals' is not distributed in either premise, making the syllogism invalid.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a chain syllogism, if "All A are B", "All B are C", and "All C are D", which conclusion is valid?
A · All A are D
By transitivity, if all A are B, all B are C, and all C are D, then all A are D.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the following chain of syllogisms: "All M are N", "All N are P", "All P are Q". Which of the following conclusions is correct?
A · All M are Q
By chaining the premises, all M are Q follows logically.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following symbolic representations correctly translates the statement "All S are P"?
A · \( \forall x (S(x) \rightarrow P(x)) \)
The universal affirmative "All S are P" is symbolized as \( \forall x (S(x) \rightarrow P(x)) \).
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Translate the proposition "Some A are not B" into symbolic form.
A · \( \exists x (A(x) \wedge eg B(x)) \)
The particular negative proposition "Some A are not B" is represented as \( \exists x (A(x) \wedge eg B(x)) \).
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which symbolic representation corresponds to the disjunctive syllogism: "Either P or Q. Not P. Therefore, Q."?
A · \( (P \lor Q) \wedge eg P \rightarrow Q \)
Disjunctive syllogism is symbolized as \( (P \lor Q) \wedge eg P \rightarrow Q \).
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the diagram below. Which of the following conclusions is valid based on the shaded areas representing "Some A are B" and "No B are C"?
A · Some A are not C
Since some A are B and no B are C, it follows that some A are not C.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In a complex syllogism, if "All A are B", "No B are C", and "Some C are D", which of the following conclusions is valid?
A · No A are C
Since no B are C and all A are B, it follows that no A are C.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid symbolic translation of the argument: "If P then Q. If Q then R. Therefore, if P then R."?
A · \( (P \rightarrow Q) \wedge (Q \rightarrow R) \rightarrow (P \rightarrow R) \)
This is the hypothetical syllogism rule, symbolized as \( (P \rightarrow Q) \wedge (Q \rightarrow R) \rightarrow (P \rightarrow R) \).
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following best defines a categorical syllogism?
A · An argument with two premises and a conclusion involving categories
A categorical syllogism consists of two premises and a conclusion, each statement relating categories or classes of things.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
In syllogistic terminology, what is the 'middle term'?
A · The term that appears in both premises but not in the conclusion
The middle term connects the two premises but does not appear in the conclusion, serving as the link between the other terms.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following statements is NOT true about a valid syllogism?
C · The conclusion can have a term not present in the premises
A valid syllogism cannot have a conclusion containing a term not present in the premises; this would be a fallacy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Identify the type of syllogism in the statement: "If it rains, then the ground is wet. It is raining. Therefore, the ground is wet."
B · Conditional syllogism
This is a conditional syllogism because it involves an if-then statement and a direct affirmation of the antecedent.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of a disjunctive syllogism?
D · Either the train arrives on time or it is delayed. The train is not delayed. Therefore, it arrives on time.
A disjunctive syllogism involves an either-or premise and the negation of one option leading to the affirmation of the other.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the syllogism: "All cats are mammals. Some mammals are carnivores. Therefore, some cats are carnivores." What type of syllogism is this?
A · Categorical syllogism
This syllogism involves categorical statements about classes and subsets, making it a categorical syllogism.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If the premises are: "Either the project is delayed or the budget is exceeded." and "The project is not delayed.", what conclusion can be drawn?
A · The budget is exceeded.
From the disjunctive premise and negation of one option, the other must be true.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Identify the correct Venn diagram representation for the syllogism: "All A are B. All B are C. Therefore, all A are C." Refer to the diagram below.
A · Diagram shows circle A completely inside B, and B completely inside C
The correct Venn diagram for this syllogism shows nested circles representing the subset relations.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the diagram below. Which conclusion is valid based on the Venn diagram showing "Some A are B" and "No B are C"?
A · Some A are not C
Since no B are C and some A are B, those A that are B cannot be C, so some A are not C.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the diagram below. Given the premises "All M are P" and "Some S are M", which conclusion is supported?
A · Some S are P
Since all M are P and some S are M, those S that are M must be P, so some S are P.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the diagram below. Which of the following conclusions is invalid based on the Venn diagram representing "No A are B" and "Some B are C"?
A · No A are C
The diagram shows no overlap between A and B but some overlap between B and C; no direct conclusion about A and C can be made.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is a valid rule for syllogistic arguments?
B · If a term is distributed in the conclusion, it must be distributed in the premise
A term distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in the premises to avoid invalid conclusions.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the premises: "No A are B" and "All C are B", which conclusion is valid?
A · No C are A
Since no A are B and all C are B, none of the C can be A, so no C are A.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following violates the rules of a valid syllogism?
C · Both premises are negative
A syllogism with two negative premises is invalid because no conclusion can be drawn.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If the premises are "All A are B" and "Some C are not B", which conclusion is logically valid?
C · No conclusion can be drawn
The premises do not provide enough information to conclude anything definite about C and A.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
From the statements "All dogs are animals" and "Some animals are pets", which conclusion is valid?
D · No conclusion can be drawn about dogs being pets
The premises do not provide enough information to conclude about dogs being pets.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the statements: "All fruits are edible" and "Some fruits are sour", which conclusion is logically valid?
A · Some edible things are sour
Since all fruits are edible and some fruits are sour, some edible things are sour.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If the premises are "No A are B" and "Some C are A", what conclusion follows?
D · No conclusion can be drawn
The premises do not provide sufficient information to conclude about C and B.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of the fallacy of the undistributed middle?
A · All cats are animals. All dogs are animals. Therefore, all cats are dogs.
The middle term 'animals' is not distributed in either premise, leading to an invalid conclusion.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Identify the fallacy in the syllogism: "All A are B. Some C are not A. Therefore, some C are not B."
A · Illicit major
The major term B is distributed in the conclusion but not in the premise, an illicit major fallacy.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which fallacy is committed in the argument: "If it is a dog, then it is an animal. It is an animal. Therefore, it is a dog."?
A · Affirming the consequent
Affirming the consequent is a fallacy where the consequent is affirmed to conclude the antecedent.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Which of the following is an example of the fallacy of exclusive premises?
A · No A are B. No C are B. Therefore, no C are A.
Both premises are negative, which is not allowed in a valid syllogism, causing the fallacy of exclusive premises.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A company has employees who are either managers or engineers. Some engineers are part-time. Which conclusion is valid?
C · Some employees are part-time
Since some engineers are part-time and engineers are employees, some employees are part-time.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If "All students who study hard pass exams" and "Some students who pass exams participate in sports", which conclusion is valid?
A · Some students who study hard participate in sports
Since some students who pass exams participate in sports and all who study hard pass exams, some who study hard participate in sports.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
A survey shows: "Either a person is employed or is a student." "Some students are part-time workers." Which conclusion is valid?
D · Some students are not employed
Since some students are part-time workers (employed), some students are not employed is not necessarily true; however, since the premise is an either-or, some students may not be employed.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the diagram below. Given the premises "All P are Q", "Some R are P", and "No R are S", which conclusion is valid?
A · Some R are Q
Since all P are Q and some R are P, some R are Q. No direct conclusion about S follows.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the premises: "All M are N", "No N are O", and "Some O are P", which conclusion is valid?
A · No M are O
Since no N are O and all M are N, no M can be O.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
If the premises are: "Some A are B", "All B are C", and "No C are D", which conclusion is valid?
A · Some A are not D
Since no C are D and all B are C, no B are D, so some A (which are B) are not D.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Refer to the diagram below. Given the premises "All X are Y", "Some Z are X", and "No Z are W", which conclusion is valid?
A · Some Z are Y
Since all X are Y and some Z are X, some Z are Y. No direct conclusion about W follows.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the premises: (i) Some A are B. (ii) All B are C. (iii) No C are D. (iv) Some D are E. Which of the following conclusions is definitely false?
C · All A are E.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the following statements: (1) No P is Q. (2) Some Q are R. (3) All R are S. (4) Some S are not P. Which of the following must be true?
A · Some R are not P.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the premises: (1) All M are N. (2) Some N are O. (3) No O are P. (4) Some P are Q. Which of the following conclusions is valid?
A · Some M are not P.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the statements: (i) Some X are Y. (ii) All Y are Z. (iii) No Z are W. (iv) Some W are X. Which of the following is a contradiction?
C · All X are Z.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the premises: (i) Some A are B. (ii) All B are C. (iii) Some C are not D. (iv) All D are E. Which of the following conclusions is logically valid?
B · Some C are E.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the following premises: (i) No S are T. (ii) Some T are U. (iii) All U are V. (iv) Some V are S. Which of the following conclusions is logically inconsistent?
D · All S are V.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the following statements: (1) Some L are M. (2) All M are N. (3) No N are O. (4) Some O are P. Which of the following is a valid conclusion?
A · Some L are not O.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given the premises: (1) Some X are Y. (2) All Y are Z. (3) No Z are W. (4) Some W are X. Which of the following conclusions is logically valid?
C · Some W are not Z.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Consider the statements: (i) All A are B. (ii) Some B are C. (iii) No C are D. (iv) Some D are A. Which of the following is a contradiction?
D · All A are C.
Question bank
Tap to reveal →
Given: (i) Some X are Y. (ii) All Y are Z. (iii) No Z are W. (iv) Some W are X. Which of the following is a valid conclusion?
C · Some W are not Z.
