👁 Preview — Study, Practice and Revise are open; mock tests and the rest of the syllabus unlock on subscription. Unlock all · ₹4,999
← Back to Verbal Reasoning
Study mode

Statement and Conclusion

Study Practice Revise 🔒 Test

Introduction to Statement and Conclusion

In verbal reasoning, especially in competitive exams, you will often encounter questions that require you to analyze a statement and decide whether a given conclusion logically follows from it. This skill tests your ability to think critically and make inferences based on information provided.

A statement is a declarative sentence that provides information. A conclusion is a judgment or decision that you draw from the statement. The challenge lies in distinguishing between what is directly supported by the statement and what is merely assumed or inferred without sufficient evidence.

Understanding the difference between facts, opinions, assumptions, and conclusions is crucial. This section will guide you through these concepts step-by-step, helping you develop a clear and logical approach to solving such problems.

Understanding Statements

Before evaluating conclusions, it is important to understand what makes up a statement.

Definition: A statement is a sentence that asserts something that can be either true or false.

Statements can be broadly categorized into:

  • Factual Statements: These are based on facts and can be verified. For example, "The Earth revolves around the Sun."
  • Opinions: These express personal beliefs or feelings and cannot be objectively verified. For example, "Chocolate ice cream is the best flavor."
  • Assumptions: These are unstated premises or beliefs that are taken for granted in the statement but are not explicitly mentioned.
Comparison of Statement Types
Type Example Explanation
Factual Statement The Taj Mahal is located in India. Can be verified as true or false.
Opinion Winter is the most pleasant season. Subjective and based on personal preference.
Assumption All students want to pass the exam. Not stated but implied; may or may not be true.

Why is this important? When evaluating conclusions, only those that logically follow from factual statements (or clearly supported assumptions) should be accepted. Opinions and unsupported assumptions cannot be the basis for valid conclusions.

Evaluating Conclusions

Once you understand the statement, the next step is to analyze the conclusions. The goal is to decide whether a conclusion definitely follows, does not follow, or cannot be determined from the statement.

Valid Conclusion: A conclusion that is directly supported by the information in the statement without requiring any additional assumptions.

Invalid Conclusion: A conclusion that contradicts the statement or requires information not provided.

Indeterminate Conclusion: When the statement does not provide enough information to decide if the conclusion is true or false.

graph TD    A[Start: Read the Statement] --> B{Is the Conclusion directly supported?}    B -- Yes --> C[Conclusion follows]    B -- No --> D{Does it contradict the statement?}    D -- Yes --> E[Conclusion does not follow]    D -- No --> F[Conclusion cannot be determined]

Common Logical Fallacies to Watch Out For:

  • Overgeneralization: Using words like "all", "always", or "none" without sufficient evidence.
  • Assuming Cause and Effect: Just because two things happen together does not mean one causes the other.
  • Ignoring Qualifiers: Words like "some", "may", or "often" limit the scope and affect conclusions.

Worked Examples

Example 1: Single Statement, Single Conclusion Easy

Statement: All birds have wings.

Conclusion: Parrots have wings.

Step 1: Identify the category mentioned in the statement: "All birds".

Step 2: Parrots are a type of bird.

Step 3: Since all birds have wings, parrots must have wings.

Answer: The conclusion follows logically from the statement.

Example 2: Two Statements, Multiple Conclusions Medium

Statements:

  • All engineers are good at mathematics.
  • Some mathematicians are good at painting.

Conclusions:

  1. All engineers are good at painting.
  2. Some engineers are good at painting.
  3. Some mathematicians are engineers.

Step 1: From statement 1, all engineers are good at mathematics.

Step 2: Statement 2 says some mathematicians are good at painting.

Step 3: Conclusion 1 says all engineers are good at painting. This is not supported by any statement; invalid.

Step 4: Conclusion 2 says some engineers are good at painting. There is no direct information about engineers and painting; cannot be determined.

Step 5: Conclusion 3 says some mathematicians are engineers. Statement 1 implies all engineers are mathematicians, but not necessarily the reverse; cannot be determined.

Answer: Conclusion 1 does not follow; conclusions 2 and 3 cannot be determined.

Example 3: Identifying Invalid Conclusions Medium

Statement: Some students in the class are athletes.

Conclusion: All students in the class are athletes.

Step 1: The statement says "some" students are athletes, which means only a part of the class.

Step 2: The conclusion says "all" students are athletes, which overgeneralizes the statement.

Answer: The conclusion does not follow and is invalid.

Example 4: Complex Inference with Assumptions Hard

Statement: The government has announced a new policy to reduce pollution by promoting electric vehicles.

Conclusion: The government wants to improve air quality.

Step 1: The statement mentions a policy to reduce pollution.

Step 2: Reducing pollution generally aims to improve air quality.

Step 3: The conclusion is an assumption based on the statement but is reasonable and directly linked.

Answer: The conclusion follows as a valid assumption.

Example 5: Logical Fallacies in Conclusions Hard

Statement: Some cars in the city are electric.

Conclusion: All cars in the city are electric.

Step 1: The statement says "some" cars are electric, meaning only a portion.

Step 2: The conclusion says "all" cars are electric, which is an overgeneralization.

Step 3: This is a common logical fallacy called hasty generalization.

Answer: The conclusion is invalid and does not follow.

Key Concept

Rules to Determine if a Conclusion Follows

1. The conclusion must be directly supported by the statement(s). 2. Avoid conclusions that require assumptions not stated. 3. Watch out for absolute words like 'all', 'none', 'always'. 4. If information is insufficient, the conclusion cannot be determined. 5. Distinguish between facts, opinions, and assumptions before concluding.

Tips & Tricks

Tip: Always check if the conclusion is directly supported by the statement without adding extra assumptions.

When to use: When evaluating if a conclusion logically follows from a statement.

Tip: Use elimination to discard conclusions that contradict the given statements.

When to use: When multiple conclusions are given and only some are valid.

Tip: Look for absolute words like "all", "none", "always" which often indicate invalid conclusions unless clearly supported.

When to use: When spotting overgeneralizations in conclusions.

Tip: Practice identifying keywords in statements and conclusions to understand their logical relationship quickly.

When to use: During timed competitive exams to save time.

Tip: Remember that a conclusion can be "true", "false", or "cannot be determined" based on the statement.

When to use: When unsure about the validity of a conclusion.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

❌ Assuming conclusions that require information not provided in the statement.
✓ Only accept conclusions strictly supported by the given statements.
Why: Students often infer beyond the given data, leading to invalid conclusions.
❌ Confusing assumptions with conclusions.
✓ Understand that assumptions are unstated premises, while conclusions are derived statements.
Why: Misunderstanding these leads to incorrect evaluation of reasoning.
❌ Ignoring qualifiers like "some", "may", "often" which affect the validity of conclusions.
✓ Pay attention to qualifiers to accurately judge conclusions.
Why: Overlooking qualifiers causes overgeneralization or incorrect rejection.
❌ Taking opinions as facts within statements.
✓ Distinguish between factual statements and opinions before evaluating conclusions.
Why: Opinions do not provide a solid basis for logical conclusions.
❌ Rushing through questions without analyzing all statements and conclusions carefully.
✓ Encourage methodical reading and elimination to avoid careless errors.
Why: Time pressure can lead to superficial analysis and wrong answers.
Curated videos per subtopic
Top YouTube explainers, AI-ranked for your exam and language. Unlocks with subscription.
Unlock

Try Practice next.

Progress tracking is paywalled — subscribe to mark subtopics as understood and save your streak.

Go to practice →
Ask a doubt
Statement and Conclusion · 10 free messages
Ask me anything about this subtopic. You have 10 free messages this session — chat history isn't saved in preview.