India is one of the world's richest countries in terms of biological diversity, home to a vast variety of plants, animals, microorganisms, and genetic resources. However, rapid industrialization, habitat loss, and unregulated use of these resources posed serious threats to this natural wealth. To address these challenges, the Biological Diversity Act 2002 was enacted by the Indian Parliament.
This Act fills important gaps left by earlier laws such as the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the Wildlife Protection Act 1972, which primarily focused on forests and wildlife protection but did not regulate the use of biological resources or ensure fair sharing of benefits arising from their use. The Biological Diversity Act 2002 aims to conserve biological diversity, promote sustainable use of its components, and ensure equitable sharing of benefits with local communities who are the traditional custodians of this knowledge.
It also aligns India's domestic laws with international commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), a global treaty adopted in 1992 to conserve biodiversity worldwide.
The Biological Diversity Act 2002 has three main objectives that work together to protect and manage India's biological wealth:
graph TD A[Biological Diversity Act 2002] A --> B[Conservation of Biological Diversity] A --> C[Sustainable Use of Biological Resources] A --> D[Fair and Equitable Benefit Sharing]
The Act establishes a three-tier institutional framework to implement its provisions effectively across the country:
| Institution | Composition | Functions | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Biodiversity Authority (NBA) | Chairperson, Members from Central Government, Experts, NGOs |
| Whole of India |
| State Biodiversity Boards (SBB) | Chairperson, Members from State Government, Experts |
| Individual States |
| Biodiversity Management Committees (BMC) | Local community members, Panchayat representatives |
| Local bodies (villages, urban wards) |
The Act regulates the access to biological resources and associated traditional knowledge to prevent exploitation and ensure that benefits are shared fairly with the resource providers. Here is the stepwise process involved:
graph TD A[Applicant submits request to NBA or SBB] B[Authority reviews application] C{Is the use commercial?} D[If yes, NBA approval required] E[If no, SBB approval sufficient] F[Approval granted with terms] G[Benefit sharing agreement signed] H[Benefits distributed to local communities] I[Monitoring and compliance checks] A --> B --> C C -->|Yes| D --> F C -->|No| E --> F F --> G --> H --> IThis process ensures that any individual, company, or institution wishing to use India's biological resources for research, commercial exploitation, or other purposes must obtain prior approval and agree to share benefits such as royalties, technology transfer, or community development funds.
Step 1: The company must identify the biological resource (the plant species) and the intended use (drug development).
Step 2: Since the use is commercial, the company must apply to the National Biodiversity Authority (NBA) for prior approval before accessing the resource.
Step 3: The application should include details such as the source of the resource, method of collection, purpose, and benefits proposed to be shared.
Step 4: NBA reviews the application, consults with the concerned State Biodiversity Board and Biodiversity Management Committees, and assesses environmental and social impacts.
Step 5: If satisfied, NBA grants approval with conditions including a benefit-sharing agreement specifying monetary or non-monetary benefits to be shared with local communities.
Step 6: The company must comply with all terms, maintain records, and report periodically to NBA.
Answer: The company must obtain prior approval from NBA through a formal application, agree to benefit sharing, and comply with monitoring requirements under the Act.
Step 1: Identify the total profit: INR 50,00,000.
Step 2: Identify the benefit-sharing percentage: 5% = 0.05.
Step 3: Calculate the benefit sharing amount:
Answer: The company must share INR 2,50,000 with the local community as per the agreement.
Step 1: The researcher accessed biological resources without prior approval from NBA, violating Section 3 of the Act.
Step 2: Unauthorized transfer of genetic material to a foreign entity violates Section 6, which regulates transfer of biological resources outside India.
Step 3: Penalties under Section 15 include imprisonment up to 5 years and/or a fine up to INR 1,00,000. Repeat offenses can lead to higher fines.
Step 4: The researcher is liable for prosecution, confiscation of biological resources, and cancellation of permissions if any were granted.
Answer: The researcher committed serious offenses by unauthorized access and transfer, punishable by imprisonment and fines under the Act.
Step 1: The BMC documents local biological resources and traditional knowledge in a People's Biodiversity Register.
Step 2: It monitors the use of resources and advises local authorities on sustainable practices.
Step 3: The BMC represents the community in negotiations for benefit sharing when outsiders seek access to resources.
Step 4: It promotes awareness and conservation activities within the village.
Answer: BMCs empower local communities to conserve biodiversity, document knowledge, and ensure fair benefits from resource use.
Step 1: Understand the scope of each Act:
Step 2: Compare objectives:
Step 3: Enforcement agencies differ: NBA and SBB under Biodiversity Act; Forest Department and Wildlife Wardens under Wildlife Protection Act.
Answer: The Biodiversity Act regulates use and sharing of biological resources broadly, while the Wildlife Protection Act specifically protects wildlife species and habitats.
When to use: During quick revision or answering objective questions.
When to use: When preparing for process-based questions.
When to use: For essay-type or conceptual questions.
When to use: When answering comparative questions or multiple-choice questions.
When to use: While memorizing institutional frameworks.
| Feature | Biological Diversity Act 2002 | Wildlife Protection Act 1972 | Indian Forest Act 1927 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | All biological resources including plants, animals, microorganisms, genetic material | Wildlife species and their habitats | Forest lands and forest produce |
| Main Objective | Conservation, sustainable use, benefit sharing | Protection of wildlife and prevention of poaching | Regulation of forests and forest produce |
| Key Institutions | NBA, SBB, BMC | Forest Department, Wildlife Wardens | Forest Department |
| Regulates | Access to biological resources, traditional knowledge, benefit sharing | Hunting, trade, sanctuaries, national parks | Forest management, timber extraction, offenses |
| Community Role | Strong role through BMCs | Limited community involvement | Minimal community participation |
| Penalties | Imprisonment up to 5 years, fines | Varies; includes imprisonment and fines | Fines and imprisonment for forest offenses |
Progress tracking is paywalled — subscribe to mark subtopics as understood and save your streak.
Go to practice →